Common Law during the 20th Century: Adaptation and Reform

Foreword

The evolution of common law throughout the 20th century presents a multifaceted narrative, shaped by shifts in societal structures, legislative reforms, and unprecedented global challenges. This article is the first in a two-part series exploring the intricate development of common law in the United Kingdom and the United States during a period marked by significant legal, social, and economic transformations. The complexity of this growth is underscored by the dual influence of domestic legal reforms and the global impact of two World Wars, events that tested and reshaped legal institutions, doctrines, and practices.

In this initial analysis, attention is given to procedural and criminal law, court restructuring, and public law, with emphasis on how these domains reflect broader societal changes. The article examines England’s transition from archaic legal forms to streamlined civil procedures, highlighted by the Judicature Acts and the revolutionary procedural reforms. Similarly, criminal law experienced a significant shift towards the protection of individual rights, as seen in the introduction of state-funded defenses and the evolution of jury trials. This exploration also delves into the broader organizational reforms of judicial systems, tracing the consolidation of English courts and the emergence of modern appellate systems.

The United States’ legal journey, while rooted in English common law traditions, reflects a divergence shaped by its unique sociopolitical landscape. The integration of common law principles with local innovations highlights the adaptability and resilience of the system. This article aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of these developments, setting the stage for the subsequent analysis of private law reforms and the continued impact of common law in modern legal contexts. Together, these articles seek to light up the enduring relevance of common law in shaping legal systems across jurisdictions.

Evolution of English Legal Framework: Milestones in Procedure and Criminal Law

The evolution of English civil and criminal law reflects a continuous effort to refine and modernize the legal system while ensuring fairness and adaptability. By 1852, the traditional structure of distinct forms of action in civil cases was replaced by a unified approach, introducing writs of summons and permitting flexible amendments to pleadings. This reform streamlined legal processes and established fixed trial dates, reducing procedural delays. The cessation of jury trials in most civil cases by 1933 marked a significant departure, limiting their role to matters like defamation and select disputes. The introduction of evidence acts further simplified proof requirements in civil litigation. Considerable procedural reforms were initiated in 1998 under the leadership of Lord Woolf, whose proposals led to the use of straightforward language, substituting archaic legal terminology with more accessible expressions. The aim was not only to enhance clarity but also to promote efficiency in judicial processes.

Figure 1: Two Lawyers Conversing. H. Daumier. 1860. The Morgan Library & Museum

In criminal law, the focus shifted toward strengthening the rights of defendants. By 1836, legal representation for the accused became a cornerstone of fairness, with the right to testify in one’s own defense established in 1898. The provision for state-funded legal counsel in 1903 and the creation of the right to appeal against convictions in 1907 were pivotal in advancing equitable treatment within the justice system. By 1967, jury verdicts could be rendered by majority decision, and regulations restricted media coverage of initial hearings to protect the integrity of proceedings. Although proposals to curtail jury trials were frequently debated, such changes were rarely enacted, except during the Northern Ireland conflict, where judges presided alone in cases involving paramilitary activity between 1973 and 2007. Legislation in the 19th century codified criminal law by defining individual offenses, excluding murder. These statutes established enduring principles, though modern developments have expanded liability by holding corporations accountable for their management's actions.

Legal insanity defenses, delineated in the 19th century, were later complemented by the concept of diminished responsibility in 1957, adding nuance to criminal defenses. Over time, the abolition of capital punishment for most crimes culminated in its elimination for murder through the Homicide Acts of 1957–1965, signaling a change toward more humane sentencing practices. Innovations in statutory law extended to property crimes, as the Theft Act of 1968, amended in 1978, replaced the antiquated notion of larceny with a broader concept aligned with the Roman delict of theft. This approach encompassed a more comprehensive understanding of dishonest appropriation. Experimentation in sentencing practices introduced measures like suspended sentences, enforceable only upon subsequent offenses, offering a rehabilitative alternative to traditional punishment. Together, these reforms underscore the adaptability of English law, balancing historical continuity with the demands of a modern society.

Evolution of Court Structures: Balancing Tradition and Reform

The reorganization of English courts throughout the 19th and 20th centuries represents a significant transformation in the legal landscape, merging historical practices with modern efficiencies. The jurisdiction once held by Church courts over secular matters concluded in 1857 with the creation of secular divorce and probate courts. These were subsequently integrated into the High Court of Justice in 1875 under the Judicature Acts of 1873–75. This reform sought not only to consolidate court structures but also to harmonize legal and equitable remedies. While equity was established as the prevailing principle in cases of conflict, common law and equity retained their distinct characteristics, reflecting their differing domains and the persistence of legal professionals in upholding the separation.

Figure 2: The Central Criminal Court of Old Bailey. 1910. Historic England.

The consolidation of the three primary common law courts into the Queen’s Bench Division marked another critical development in the late 19th century. Since 1875, cases in this division have been adjudicated by a single judge, sometimes involving a jury until 1933. Meanwhile, the chancery expanded its jurisdiction beyond equity, encompassing statutory provisions on property, bankruptcy, intellectual property, and taxation. Contested probate matters were also assigned to the chancery following the Courts Act of 1971. That same year saw the establishment of the Family Division, focusing on matrimonial and child-related issues, further modernizing the High Court’s functions. Criminal and civil trials experienced notable procedural changes. The outdated system of assizes and quarter-sessions was replaced by permanent provincial crown courts, ensuring more consistent and frequent access to justice.

Civil assizes were similarly restructured, allowing the High Court to convene in designated cities, while small civil disputes have been governed by statutory county courts since 1846, with significant updates introduced in 1984. A distinguishing feature of English criminal justice remains the enduring role of lay magistrates, even as legally trained district judges have been appointed in major urban centers. Lay magistrates, who have jurisdiction over juvenile offenders, were bolstered by the establishment of specialized youth courts in 1908. Reports such as the 1948 Royal Commission on Justices of the Peace defended the contributions of lay adjudication, leading to the enactment of the Justices of the Peace Act (1949) and the Magistrates’ Courts Act (1980). Subsequent reforms expanded the authority of magistrates, streamlined procedures, and introduced judicial training regulated by the Judicial Studies Board.

The evolution of lay magistracy demonstrates a commitment to preserving historical institutions while adapting to contemporary needs, as evidenced by the enhanced accountability of appointing committees and the provision of digital training resources. Appellate court systems also underwent significant refinement. The Court of Appeal, formed in 1875, replaced earlier appellate mechanisms in civil matters. A dedicated Court of Criminal Appeal, established in 1907, was later integrated into the broader Court of Appeal in 1966. Appeals on legal points from magistrates’ decisions are addressed by a divisional court, while the Supreme Court, established by the Constitutional Reform Act of 2005, serves as the final arbiter, replacing the appellate function of the House of Lords. This progressive restructuring reflects an ongoing effort to balance traditional legal principles with the demands of a modern judicial system, ensuring both accessibility and justice.

Figure 3: Divisional Court of the Queens Bench Division. A.Temple Felix Clay 1889. Royal Courts of Justice Bar Room

Legal Evolution in Public and Private Spheres

The development of public and private law in England has reflected both the dynamic interplay between domestic traditions and external influences, as well as a response to societal and administrative demands. In the early 20th century, public law lacked a defined framework to regulate governance distinct from private legal principles. This absence, sometimes seen as a point of national pride in contrast to centralized legal systems abroad, concealed the reality of minimal constraints on governmental authority. Over time, regulatory measures for local administration and judicial challenges during the World Wars fostered the emergence of nascent public-law principles. These sought to balance executive discretion with accountability for administrative actions.

The United Kingdom's accession to the European Economic Community in 1973 was a turning point, introducing mechanisms rooted in French administrative legal systems to scrutinize national and EU institutions. These measures emphasized compliance with treaty-defined powers and underscored the convergence of European and English legal norms. By the 1980s, public law was recognized as a distinct branch, though by the early 21st century, it was more accurately viewed as an assimilation of European principles into common law. This integration marked a transformative era, blending domestic traditions with supranational frameworks. However, the UK's departure from the EU in 2020 raised questions about the potential unwinding of decades of legal assimilation, underscoring tensions between sovereignty and interconnected legal systems.

Parallel to public law developments, private law reforms have been driven by the Law Commission since 1965. Notable successes include advancements in corporate manslaughter and third-party contract rights, although many proposals, such as the codification of criminal law, remain unrealized due to political inertia. In property law, the 1925 introduction of land title registration ensured greater uniformity, while rules for intestate succession were consolidated. Tenant protections expanded through rent control acts and leasehold enfranchisement laws, enabling long-term leaseholders to purchase freeholds. Trust law evolved with courts gaining authority to modify terms and expanded trustee investment powers.

Figure 4: The Defender. H.Daumier. 1865. National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C.

The legal landscape of personal and professional relationships underwent significant reform, marked by interconnected changes in family and employment law. In family law, the Divorce Reform Act 1969 redefined marital dissolution by adopting the "breakdown of marriage" as the primary standard, signaling a shift from fault-based approaches to more pragmatic considerations. This evolution was complemented by the Family Law Act 1996, which further advanced the ethos of resolution and cooperation by prioritizing mediation as a means of settling disputes. These developments reflected a broader societal commitment to fairness and reconciliation in private life.

Simultaneously, employment law saw parallel advancements that underscored a similar dedication to equity and protection within the workplace. The Employment Rights Act 1996 exemplified this trend by codifying and enhancing worker safeguards, ensuring that labor relationships adhered to principles of fairness and mutual respect. Together, these reforms highlighted an overarching legal emphasis on balancing individual rights with collective responsibilities in both domestic and professional domains.

Tort law, particularly in negligence, has dominated litigation since the landmark 1932 case establishing manufacturers’ liability to consumers, further solidified by defamation reforms.

The Human Rights Act 1998 especially reshaped English law, embedding the European Convention on Human Rights into domestic practice. Public institutions have adjusted procedures to protect individual rights, facing judicial scrutiny in cases involving life and liberty. Legislative amendments, like the Gender Recognition Act 2004, exemplify the ongoing evolution driven by societal needs and judicial influence. Together, these reforms in public and private law illustrate the adaptability of English legal systems, balancing tradition with innovation in response to complex societal and global challenges.

Figure 5: The Supreme Court. UK

Revolution in American Law during the 20th Century

The 20th century marked a transformative era in American legal history, characterized by profound reforms and the institutionalization of processes aimed at clarifying and modernizing the legal system. These changes were driven by industrialization, social movements, and the complexities of an increasingly interconnected society. Central to this transformation was the establishment of the American Law Institute (ALI) in 1923, a pivotal organization dedicated to advancing legal scholarship and reform. ALI’s contributions underline the systematic evolution of American jurisprudence during this period.

Founded in response to the pervasive inconsistencies and uncertainties in the law, the ALI sought to produce comprehensive resources that would enhance the accessibility, coherence, and uniformity of legal principles. One of its most significant initiatives was the creation of the Restatements of the Law. The Restatements were conceived as scholarly syntheses of common law, addressing areas such as Contracts, Torts, Property, and Agency. These documents aimed to distill prevailing legal doctrines into clear, accessible formats for courts, practitioners, and academics. By providing a definitive guide to the interpretation of legal norms, the Restatements have been instrumental in harmonizing the application of law across jurisdictions, reducing unpredictability in legal outcomes.

Figure 6: Volumes of Restatement of the Law. 1939. ALI

Another cornerstone of ALI's impact was the development of the Model Penal Code (MPC), a project initiated in 1952 and finalized in 1962. The MPC was a groundbreaking effort to standardize criminal law by addressing longstanding ambiguities and disparities in state laws. Unlike the Restatements, which articulated existing common law, the MPC sought to establish a forward-looking framework for criminal justice. It proposed reforms to areas such as sentencing, culpability, and defenses, emphasizing proportionality and fairness. The Code has profoundly influenced state legislatures, with many adopting its provisions to modernize their criminal statutes. Its enduring legacy lies in its capacity to adapt to contemporary challenges, such as changes in societal attitudes toward issues like drug policy and mental health. The mid-20th century also saw the ALI’s active engagement with civil rights issues, reflecting broader societal movements advocating for equality and justice.

Legal scholars and practitioners affiliated with the Institute contributed to landmark efforts that dismantled systemic racial segregation and institutionalized discrimination. These efforts were not confined to racial justice; the Institute also influenced legal reforms addressing gender equality and labor rights, reinforcing its commitment to aligning the law with evolving social values. Additionally, the ALI played a significant role in modernizing commercial and corporate law, areas of increasing complexity in the 20th century’s rapidly evolving economic landscape. For example, its Principles of Corporate Governance sought to balance the interests of shareholders, executives, and other stakeholders, fostering greater accountability and transparency within corporate structures. Similarly, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), a collaborative project with other legal organizations, streamlined transactions across state lines, thereby facilitating economic growth and reducing legal barriers in trade and commerce.

The ALI’s contributions extended to the emerging field of consumer protection, tackling the growing complexity of contractual relationships in a consumer-driven economy. The Institute’s work in this area focused on ensuring fairness and clarity in contracts, particularly those involving standard form agreements often misunderstood by laypersons. By prioritizing consumer rights and equitable practices, these reforms enhanced trust in legal and economic systems. A defining characteristic of the ALI’s approach has been its commitment to inclusivity and intellectual diversity. By incorporating a wide range of perspectives from academics, judges, and practitioners, the Institute has secured that its work remains relevant and reflective of societal needs. This inclusiveness has also helped bridge gaps between legal theory and practice, fostering a dynamic interplay that continues to shape American jurisprudence.

Figure 7: "The Committee on the Establishment of a Permanent Organization for the Improvement of the Law" 1923. ALI

The broader significance of the 20th century’s legal revolution lies in its synthesis of tradition and innovation. While the ALI and other reformers sought to modernize the law, they did so within the framework of foundational principles, such as the rule of law and the protection of individual rights. This balance ensured that legal reforms were not merely reactive but also grounded in enduring values. Through its Restatements, Model Penal Code, and initiatives in corporate governance and consumer protection, the Institute has left an indelible mark on the legal landscape. Its efforts to clarify, modernize, and adapt the law have not only enhanced its fairness and accessibility but also ensured its resilience in the face of changing societal needs. As American law continues to evolve, the legacies of 20th-century reforms underscore the enduring importance of deliberate, scholarly engagement with legal systems.

Conclusion

The evolution of common law during the 20th century illustrates a dynamic interplay between tradition and innovation, as legal systems responded to the challenges of modernization, globalization, and societal transformation. In England, the unification of legal procedures, enhanced protections for the accused, and comprehensive judicial restructuring underscore the adaptability of the legal framework. These reforms, exemplified by the Judicature Acts, Lord Woolf’s procedural recommendations, and the development of specialized divisions within the High Court, reflect a commitment to balancing efficiency with justice.

Public law, previously underdeveloped in England, emerged as a vital domain, driven by the necessity to regulate government actions and protect individual rights. Influenced by European administrative law, the integration of public law into the English legal system marked a significant departure from earlier practices, a development that continues to shape contemporary governance. The Human Rights Act of 1998 further exemplifies this shift, bridging the gap between domestic law and international human rights standards.

The 20th century was transformative for American law, marked by innovations driven by industrialization and social movements. Central to this evolution was the American Law Institute (ALI), established in 1923 to address legal inconsistencies. Its Restatements of the Law harmonized legal doctrines, enhancing clarity and coherence across jurisdictions. The Model Penal Code modernized criminal law, emphasizing fairness and adaptability. ALI also contributed to civil rights advancements, corporate governance, and consumer protection, reflecting a commitment to equity and inclusion. By balancing tradition with innovation, these reforms ensured the legal system's responsiveness to societal change while upholding foundational principles.

These developments collectively underscore the enduring relevance of common law as a foundation for legal systems across diverse jurisdictions. Its adaptability allows it to address contemporary issues while retaining its core principles of fairness, precedent, and equity. The forthcoming second article will build upon this foundation, examining private law reforms and the transnational impact of common law in the 21st century. By understanding the evolution of common law, we gain insight into its role as a stabilizing force in an ever-changing legal landscape, reinforcing its position as a cornerstone of justice and governance.

Bibliographic References

Baker, J. H. (2019). An Introduction to English Legal History (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Blackstone, W. (1765–1769). Commentaries on the Laws of England. Oxford University Press.

Friedman, L. M. (2016). A History of American Law (4th ed.). Simon & Schuster.

Horwitz, M. J. (1977). The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860. Harvard University Press.

Kent, J. (1826–1830). Commentaries on American Law. O. Halsted.

Langbein, J. H., Lerner, R., & Smith, B. P. (2009). History of the Common Law: The Development of Anglo-American Legal Institutions. Aspen Publishers.

Reid, J. P. (1981). Constitutional History of the American Revolution: The Authority of Law. University of Wisconsin Press.

Ricketson, S. (1987). The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works: 1886–1986. Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary College.

Story, J. (1833). Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States. Hilliard, Gray, and Co.

Tomlins, C. L. (2005). Law, Labor, and Ideology in the Early American Republic. Cambridge University Press.

Visual References